Completed
1. Fieldwork
Looking at what already exists. Each partner reviewed laws, policies, research and good practices on the employment of individuals with autism in their own country. The three national reviews were then combined into one European comparison. [link when published]
Listening to workplaces. In the Netherlands, Italy and Spain, the partners held in-depth interviews and mixed focus groups with HR professionals, managers, employees and individuals with autism. All three countries used the same interview guides and the same way of analysing what people said, so the results can be compared.
The aim was to find patterns that repeat across workplaces: in hiring, in communication and in how work is organised and judged. Finding individuals with autism willing to take part was itself difficult in several countries, because of privacy concerns and because many neurodivergent employees are not visible at work. The partners treat this as one of the findings. [link when published]
In progress
2. Training
The fieldwork findings shaped a two-session training for HR professionals.
Session 1 lays the foundations: what autism and neurodiversity are, why language matters, and how HR procedures look from this perspective. Participants then work through an interview scenario step by step: before the interview, during it, communication style, and autonomy and accessibility.
Session 2 opens with APHIA’s research findings. It then looks at masking, common myths, strengths and support needs, and how the physical workplace can help or hinder. It ends with models of disability and what they mean for everyday inclusion. Participants also name one zero-cost change their organisation could make tomorrow.
Participants fill in a short questionnaire before and after the training. Between September and October 2026, pilot trainings took place in the Netherlands, Spain and Italy with HR professionals. The training materials are released under an open licence (CC BY-SA).
Upcoming
3. Follow-up
Trained HR professionals will share the training in their own organisations, with the partners’ support. A follow-up questionnaire will then show what has changed in practice. The results will be shared in national reports and one common report.